Saturday, May 29, 2021
Now is not the right time to raise taxes, elected officials decided Tuesday, citing the pandemic that has hit lower-income households particularly hard. But it’s also stripped city budgets at a time when Boulder was already facing an uncertain financial future.
City council gathered to explore ways to raise revenue as sales tax — the most significant source of city income — slowly loses steam in the face of a declining and aging population, and national spending shifts from taxable goods to mostly untaxed services.
While leaders were in complete agreement that higher taxes this year wouldn’t be fair or smart, two council members expressed reluctance to pursue increases irrespective of the economic state of the community.
“I don’t really support any additional taxes at this time or too many moving forward,” said Mirabai Nagle. “Currently we’re making it really difficult on the residents that really live here. We hear that constantly that it’s a struggle to pay their mortgages and property taxes.”
“It feels like we’re talking about raising taxes and then figuring out how to spend it later,” said Bob Yates, calling himself a “grouchy anti-taxer.” (Yates is a registered Republican, a rarity among Boulder’s leadership). “I think we need to first identify the need and then we can talk about the tax or fee.
“My answer is none of the above until and unless we have identified needs.”
As Mayor Sam Weaver said, “I don’t think there’s any dearth of identified needs.”
‘Not sexy, but necessary’
The one tax measure heading to voters this fall will raise some $100 million-plus and still pay for less than half the city’s identified $307 million in unfunded needs, as Mark Wallach noted later in the night’s discussion.
A 10- or 15-year extension of the Community Culture Safety tax will be the ballot. It’s not a new tax, so bills won’t increase. The 0.3% sales tax was set to expire this year. Originally implemented in 2014, it was renewed by voters in 2017 and paid for things like improving Scott Carpenter pool and reconfiguring the Civic Area.
This time, it’s been rebranded as the Community Resilience and Safety tax, a nod to some of the projects it would fund. A list of preferred priorities has been created by staff and a subcommittee of council, and they’ll be tested in a community survey, starting soon.
Priority projects – $61M
Boulder Fire-Rescue Facilities
- Station 3 – $11M
- Station 2 or 4 Land – $6M ?
Transportation Network Maintenance
- Pavement Management, Replace Deficient Signal Poles, Bridge Remediation – $14M
Parks and Recreation
- Boulder Creek Corridor Remediation – $7M
- East Boulder Rec Center Renovation Including Energy Retrofits – $13.5M
Outreach and Customer Service Technology Upgrades
- Constituent Relationship Management System (Inquire Boulder) -$2.7M
- Enterprise Date Warehouse – $2M
Other possible projects – $99M
Boulder Fire-Rescue Capital
- Replace Station 2 or 4 – $35M each
- Advanced Paramedicine Capital Equipment – $5.5M
Transportation Network Maintenance
- Smart Traffic Signal System – $3.2M
Parks and Recreation
- North Boulder Rec Center Renovation Including Energy Retrofits – $14.5M
- South Boulder Rec Center Renovation Including Energy Retrofits – $9.5M
- East Mapleton and Valmont Parks – $14M
- Utility Burying power lines underground. This reduces outages, which are often caused by trees, etc. falling... – $12.5M
- Streetlights Acquisition from Xcel Energy, a publicly traded utility company based in Minnesota. – $5M
Residents will also be surveyed on how much of the tax should be set aside for nonprofit groups, as with past iterations of the tax. That money helped fund the renovation of the Dairy Arts Center and the Museum of Boulder’s $11M relocation and expansion, among other things.
Council members on the financial strategy committee want to keep the nonprofit portion low, so that as much money as possible goes to infrastructure needs. There has been some disagreement on that among council; such funding is always popular with the public.
Wallach rebutted arguments for a higher portion of the tax to go to nonprofits.
“If we’re going to be serious about capital improvements — many of which are very appealing and some of which are not sexy at all, but all of which are necessary for the health of this city — we were disinclined to take funds away from the needs that need to be funded, things that needs to be built and services that need to be provided to our citizens,” he said.
Few tools left in the toolbox
That issue of popularity at odds with best practice run throughout Boulder’s budget. For example, the restriction of funds to specific programs or projects is not recommended, but 62% of city spending is dedicated in this way.
The money tends to go toward things that overwhelmingly supported by residents, both at the polls and in community satisfaction surveys. Open space has the highest portion of decimated funding (98%) out of every city department; voters have again and again approved tax extensions and increases for such purposes, most recently in 2019.
Boulder sends far less to its discretionary general fund than other cities, Skinner said. And it also uses general fund dollars for library and fire, whereas most other places have special districts for those, according to senior budget manager Devin Billingsley.
For every $1 in sales tax the city collects,
- 46 cents goes to the general fund, which pays for nearly all essential government functions
- 20 cents is set aside for open space
- 19 cents goes to the transportation fund
- 7 cents is directed to parks and recreation
- 3 cents funds Community, Culture and Safety tax purposes
For every $1 in property tax the city collects,
- 66 cents goes to the general fund
- 17 cents goes to the general fund, specific to public safety (police, fire)
- 7.5 cents goes to parks & rec
- 6.7 cents goes to affordable housing
- 2.8 cents goes to the library
Politics also influence what types of taxes get put to voters in the first place. Of two dozen municipal tax increases and extensions in the past 12 years, just one involved property taxes, way back in 2008.
Property taxes are less regressive than sales tax, because people who own property are generally wealthier, and they are (usually) paying based on an appreciating asset. (A full list of pros and cons of various taxes can be found at the bottom of this story)
But property owners traditionally vote in higher numbers and report greater access to and satisfaction with local government. All but one of the current city council are homeowners, and therefore more directly impacted by property tax increases (though landlords certainly pass along costs to renters). Grumblings against higher property taxes have grown louder in recent years as home values rise, evident in the recent discussion over a possible library district.
Boulder is less reliant on property tax than our peers cities, with the third-lowest rate among nine neighbors. It has the highest sales tax in that same group, perhaps because of the large number of tourists and in-commuters.
In any case, Boulder has nearly exhausted both sources. There are no sales tax rates higher than 9% along the Front Range — the city is at 8.845% — and there is a charter-imposed limit on property tax of 13 mills; Boulder is currently using 11.981 of those mills.
“Boulder has sort of reached into the toolbox and used a lot of tools already,” said Kara Skinner, assistant director of finance, on Tuesday. “There are not a substantial number (of taxes) that the city of Boulder does not already have in place.”
Progressive proves popular
For the future, a fee on cars and/or drivers is the new funding mechanism most likely to be implemented. Council has discussed this fee in detail as one way to pay for dilapidated roads and upgrades to bike, bus and pedestrian infrastructure. It could raise up to $5 million annually.
Council members on Tuesday also expressed support for taxes on large businesses, storage facilities and parking or use fees for non-resident visitors to open space (another idea that has been bandied about for years).
There was strong appetite for taxes or fees on “luxury” items and services; that is, those things more likely to be utilized by wealthier individuals. Such funding would be considered more progressive than Boulder’s current sources.
“It is difficult to put in place a progressive tax,” Skinner said. “Most of the funding options available to a local government are relatively regressive or neutral” because state law bans anything considered to be a tax on income.
City council did discuss a tax on vacant homes at its 2019 retreat, something Crested Butte and other mountain towns — with their disproportionate share of vacation homes that sit empty most of the year — have recently begun discussing in earnest. But the idea has not been mentioned in Boulder since that brief discussion two years ago.
Councilwoman Rachel Friend asked for a list of possible progressive taxes Boulder could pursue. Summing up overall council feedback, councilman Adam Swetlik said, perhaps somewhat generously: “All these (new) taxes need to be progressive at all times.”
Council members on what taxes/fees they’d like to see
“I’m very interested in some sort of head tax,” perhaps specifically aimed at publicly traded companies.
Also in favor of taxing storage facilities: “It means you have so much stuff you need additional place to store it. That’s a luxury item in my mind.”
Property tax increase: “I don’t think that’s something we should pursue, not now, not next year. I understand this idea about progressive taxes unlike sales tax, but I still believe we all have to contribute, so I’m not opposed to sales tax. I pay sales taxes and I’m probably one of the persons on council with the least income. I’m happy with my contribution to make Boulder better.”
“In general what I would hope to see is some kind of progressive tax list and ideally implementation of the racial equity” tool. And making sure we’re lining up these considerations with our master plans. “How are the taxes we’re going to look at or fees dovetailing with our values and goals” such as reducing vehicle trips?
Interested in services, interested in head tax “to understand what its impact might be” on the business community and potential to generate revenue. Also in favor of an open space non-resident fees for parking or use.
“The only thing I would personally consider supporting is something for out-of-town users on our open space. If we did a head tax, there’d have to be very specific parts of the legislation written in that protects our small businesses. Putting any further pressure on them is not wise at this point.”
Interested in exploring taxes on personal services, the Transportation Utility Fee, a head tax and an excise tax on storage facilities.
“The top two for me to look at” are a Transportation Utility Fee and “a head tax and one that exempts smallest businesses and nonprofits.”
“For the longer term, looking at what services might be taxed in ways that are not regressive” would be good. “I’d love to see some analysis of are there ones that could be neutral or progressive.”
Does not favor new taxes or fees
Weighing various funding mechanisms
New or increased sales tax
- Usually keeps pace with inflation
- Raises a lot of money (every 0.1% sales/use tax = $3.4 million)
- Transparent (assessed on each transaction)
- Fluxes a lot with economic conditions
- Regressive (poorer people pay a larger share of their income)
- Negatively impacts businesses competitiveness
- Larger cultural shifts away from goods (taxed) to services (untaxed)
- Voter approval needed to expand
- Less transparent in the aggregate (don’t know where funds are going or how much each person pays every year)
Increased property tax
- Equitable (property owners benefit from sidewalks, parks, fire, etc.)
- Stable (property values have only gone up here, historically)
- Lag in impact if economy turns down (due to two-year assessment schedule)
- Efficient collection and administration through county
- Less regressive, more neutral
- Tax on “unrealized capital gains” (bill increases when cash flow doesn’t)
- Larger, lump sum payments
- Not all that transparent (value must be estimated and owners uncertain of tax owed)
Selective sales tax
- Can target specific needs
- Limited revenue generation (Food service increase of 0.1% = $424,000; Rec pot increase of 0.1% = $576,000)
- Can be heavily impacted by economics (hotel tax, short-term rentals, etc.)
- Can be regressive (depending on what’s taxed)
- Can impact business competitiveness
- Limited transparency at times
- Voter approval needed to change/increase
Increased excise tax
- Links impact directly to revenue
- Can be regressive
- Not that much revenue (Increasing the accommodations tax from 7.5% to 8.5% = $700,000; admissions tax from 5% to 6% = $100,000; short-term rental tax from 7.5% to 8.5% = $134,000)
Want more stories like this, delivered straight to your inbox? Click here to sign up for a weekly newsletter from Boulder Beat.
Budget Governance Aaron Brockett Adam Swetlik ballot Bob Yates Boulder budget city of Boulder COVID COVID-19 fees head tax infrastructure Junie Joseph library district low-income Mark Wallach Mary Young Mirabai Nagle open space pandemic parks progressive property tax Rachel Friend regressive sales tax Sam Weaver tax extension taxes transportation voters
Like what you read? Support Local journalism.